Open Access

Role of cancer-associated fibroblasts in tumor structure, composition and the microenvironment in ovarian cancer (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Wei Sun
    • Shilong Fu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 8, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10587
  • Pages: 2173-2178
  • Copyright: © Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Ovarian cancer (OVAC) remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy; it is ranked fifth among the most common types of cancer that affect women worldwide. Several aspects of the disease, including molecular pathogenesis, epidemiology, histological subtypes, poor prognosis at early stages due to the absence of specific signs and symptoms, and curative treatments in the advanced stages are all responsible for the poor survival rate, which is evaluated to be at 5 years once the cancer is diagnosed and treatment begins. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer is therefore crucial, even though unexplored pathways, in order to improve the prognosis of patients with OVAC and to develop novel therapeutic approaches. Accordingly, the tumor microenvironment, defined as the combination of proteins produced by all tumor cells and by non‑cancerous cells or the stroma, and composed of several cells, including those from the immune, inflammatory and adipose systems, as well as the mesenchymal stem, endothelial and fibroblasts cells, has recently attracted attention. Of particular interest are fibroblasts, which can be activated into cancer‑associated fibroblast (CAFs) to become a potent supporter of carcinogenesis, promoting the initiation of epithelial tumor formation, tumor growth, angiogenesis and metastasis, as well as therapeutic resistance and immunosuppression. Thus, the targeting of CAFs for early diagnosis and effective therapy warrants our attention. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms through which CAFs may affect the structure, composition and microenvironment of the ovarian tumor. We also aim to highlight important aspects of OVAC pathobiology involving CAFs, in an attempt to provide insight into novel diagnostic windows and provide new therapeutic perspectives.

Introduction

Among the various types of gynecological cancers, ovarian cancer (OVAC) remains the most lethal type which affects women worldwide. Indeed, several aspects of OVAC render it a very challenging malignancy for diagnosis and treatment. The survival rates are estimated to be approximately 5 years, following diagnosis at an early stage of the disease, which very rarely occurs, as the symptoms are non-specific and can be summarized into ordinary abdominal pain or bloating (1). The survival of women with OVAC is often closely related to the outcome of surgical reduction (2) that arises when the cancer has already progressed to the stage of aggressive metastases to the adjacent abdominal organs (1,3).

Therefore, the acute forms of OVAC usually correspond to the advanced stages, when the cancer has eventually reached the level of intestinal obstruction and pleural effusion. In general, abdominal bloating or swelling, adnexal mass, changes in menstruation, rectal bleeding or atypical glandular cells on a cervical cytology examination, discomfort in the pelvic area, frequent urinary needs and changes in bowel habits refer to subacute manifestation (1,4). When a patient reaches such an advanced stage of the disease, the clinical management consists of performing a reduction surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or vice versa (5). Subsequently, depending on the cases encountered, following the initial response, tumor recurrence is mostly observed due to residual disease in women who will eventually succumb to the disease due to progressive chemoresistance (5).

Moreover, the stimulation of immune system through the use of immunotherapy, which has recently been used to effectively eliminate tumors in various type of cancer, has been limited in some patients, which have become unresponsive or have developed resistance (6,7). In general, despite progress being made in the treatment of OVAC, a large number of women (70–80%) who have first responded to treatment eventually suffer a relapse and succumb to the disease (8). Thus, it is mandatory to improve the early diagnosis of OVAC and to develop effective treatments in order to cope with current surgical limitations and reduce resistance to treatment that often occurs in response to chemotherapy (5) or recently in response to immunotherapy (6,7). Therefore, taking all early observations into consideration, and as suggested by the data, therapies targeting only cancer cells alone seem to be insufficient for the treatment of such a malignant cancer and arguments are in favor of co-targeting cancer cells and their microenvironment (9).

Indeed, the heterogeneity of OVAC is likely related to epigenetic and genetic factors (10), which has led to the failure of effective eradication due to the complexity of signaling networks that are themselves interconnected in a complex manner. The microenvironment of the tumor, distinct from the peritoneal tumor (11), also plays a role in effective treatment, and is composed by all the proteins that will be produced by various tumor cells, including several types of immune cells, such as macrophages, natural killer cells and T cells, as well as a large number of chemokines and cytokines at the level of extracellular matrix (ECM) (12). All these components will actively interact together for the promotion of OVAC cell growth and metastasis (13). The tumor microenvironment (TME) also contains non-cancerous cells, termed the stroma, which is composed of several types of cells, including endothelial cells, mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, adipocytes, pericytes, and inflammatory and immune systems cells (14). It has been shown that fibroblasts, the major component of the stroma, can be stimulated by a variety of proliferative signals to become activated fibroblast, termed cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Over time, CAFs have been identified as an essential component of tumor progression (15) that maintain the microenvironment optimal for cancer cell survival and proliferation (15,16) through reciprocal crosstalk between cancer cells and fibroblasts. Data suggest that CAFs are involved in epithelial progression, cancer invasion, metastasis and therapeutic resistance, since following their activation, they provide, in turn, a favorable and adequate microenvironment owing to the various soluble factors produced (17). In general, the Data suggest that, together with cancer cells, CAFs may be one of the essential components of the TME that could represent molecular therapeutic targets for the treatment of cancer (18). Hence, the pathological understanding of OVAC through the close involvement of CAFs in malignant tumors is crucial for developing novel strategies for early diagnosis and/or therapies (19).

Role of ovarian fibroblasts

Anatomically, ovaries are retro-peritoneal organs, ovoid in shape, presenting two main regions including the cortex and the medulla. The cortical region, also termed the stroma, is full of connective tissues, low in collagen fibers, but rich in fibroblasts and myofibroblasts and contains the ovarian organelles (follicles). Fibroblasts play important roles in this environment, including guiding inflammation, ECM deposition, epithelial differentiation regulation (20) and wound healing (20,21). Indeed, many components of the fibrillar ECM, including collagens type I, III and V and fibronectin are synthesized by fibroblasts (21,22) that also play a role in the creation of basement membranes via the excretion of type IV collagen and laminin (23). In addition, fibroblasts also secrete matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), ECM-degrading proteases, that emphasize the crucial role of fibroblasts in maintaining ECM homeostasis through the regulation of its turnover (23,24). Therefore, fibroblasts are considered as the main origin of ECM components and the principal mediators of scarring and tissue fibrosis. Accordingly, in the stroma compartment, fibroblasts are the element that tightly control the maintenance of ovaries or tissue homeostasis through different interactions between cells and the production of ECM components, the result of which is to provide the elements necessary for the proper architecture and function of tissues. That said, changes in the characteristics of the stroma are indeed an initial attempt to ‘repair the damage’ by inducing a transformation of the epithelium and, interestingly, fibroblasts can ‘detect’ signals between cells and the ECM through their adhesion's integrin-dependent cell-matrix, and subsequent changes occur in the dynamics and composition of the stroma. The reciprocal complex interactions between the stroma and epithelium result in changes in the ECM and tumor stroma (25). This control is crucial to preserve normal organ or tissue morphology and for fibroblasts to have a proper function, as the function of normal fibroblasts is typically to suppress tumor formation (26).

However, it well known that compared to fibroblasts isolated from healthy organs or tissues, those involved in the cicatrization or are derived from fibrotic tissue secrete significantly higher levels of normal constituents of the ECM (27,28). Such activated fibroblasts decrease their production once the wound is repaired and the resting phenotype is then supposedly restored (21). However, it is unknown whether these activated fibroblasts recover or rest in a resting phenotype followed by restocking of this particular tissue region, leaving fibroblasts at rest from the adjacent tissue (29). This is relevant since as regards organic fibrosis, fibroblasts located on the tumor site remain activated and experimental data have suggested a leading role for fibroblasts in defining the degree and magnitude of the tumor evolution (30). Thus, the mechanisms underlying the unmitigated activation of fibroblasts remain largely unknown.

Origin of ovarian CAFs

Although the origin of activated fibroblasts remains enigmatic, it has long been thought that their main source was resident fibroblasts or mesenchymal stem cells (31), as observed with the conversion of mesothelial cells into myofibroblasts by mesothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (MMT) (32), becoming the most important source of CAFs in inflammatory and fibrotic peritoneal pathologies (33). However, CAFs appear at first as the host the response caused by tumor growth in response to epithelial damage (34,35). Initially, the recruitment of CAFs in the nascent neoplastic region may reflect the antitumor early response (35,36). The accumulation of CAFs in the wound will facilitate a series of cascades of repair and tissue remodeling, in addition to controlling repairs and preventing possible tissue damage (35,37). However, organic fibrosis, which is a condition associated with the continuous activation of fibroblasts, results in chronic inflammation and altered lesions, and in the generation of the functional renewal of the affected tissue CAFs. This may bring about a fundamental program, seemingly enhanced by other cells, to border the unnecessary scar response, as the latter may result in fibrosis (3841). In addition, biological aging or fibroblast senescence can also be related to the numerous excretions of pro-tumorigenic factors and may result in fibroblast activation during oncogenesis. The related downregulation of NOTCH CSL effector proteins, as well as p53 protein effectors can overcome the intrinsic safety mechanism of senescence, and allow CAF activation and proliferation (42).

However, it is known that injured epithelial and immune cells are recruited by cytokines released at the site of injury into normal tissues, including molecular patterns associated with damage, secreted growth factors, such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β proteins, platelet-derived growth factors (PDGFs), inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [interferon (INFγ; IFNG), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α; TNF), interleukins (ILs)] (29,43), reactive oxygen species (ROS), matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) (44) and the production of extracellular collagelike proteins, such as laminins, elastin, etc. (45). These mediators induce CAFs from resident fibroblasts and suggest that the activation of fibroblasts into CAFs results from numerous pathways activated by factors from OVAC cells. For example, the upregulation of TNFα vs. TGF-α, subsequently regulated by an inflammatory process, activates nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) (19) and may activate CAFs. In turn, TGFα resulting from the activation by CAFs may induce epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in OVAC, thereby stimulating cancer cell growth (46). The activation of fibroblasts is in general promoted in vivo via the TGF-β-Smad-dependent MMT program (47). Additionally, a minor source of CAFs is omental adipocytes, which undergo the loss of lipids or lipid derivatives and differentiate into fibroblastoids or pre-adipocytes at the adipose stage (4850), or a variation of adipocytes into fibroblasts, as observed in type 2 diabetes or obesity, during inflammatory fibrotic edifications due to dysfunctional adipose tissue (51). The source of CAFs has been also suggested to derive from vasculopathies and atherosclerotic plaques (52), in which the transition from an endothelial to a mesenchymal phenotype has been observed (53).

Mechanisms through which CAFs affect tumor structure, composition and the microenvironment in ovarian cancer

Once activated, CAFs induces the signalization of EGFR in cancer cells and promote the growth of cancer cells (46) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) following activation by the increased expression of the progranulin peptide (PGRN), known to stimulate EMT, positively regulating α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) in fibroblasts. More importantly, molecular interference between CAFs and the OVAC TME, upregulated by the TGF-β/TGF-βRs/Smad pathway in CAFs, leads to overexpression and subsequent gene secretion targets in the form of versican (54) involved in migration and invasion by CD44 binding subsequently activated by the NF-κB and JNK signaling pathways. This offers the possibility for OVAC cells to further support a pro-inflammatory TME and tumor evolution (54). It should also be noted that increased levels of PGRN and α-SMA, as well as low levels of the cell adhesin molecule (CAM, E-cadherin, during CAF activation promote a poor prognosis (14,55).

During the progression of OVAC, the stromal cells that surround the tumor appear to be a distinct ‘innocent’; microenvironment, which in reality, hides various complex interactions between tumor and stromal cells and particularly CAFs, leading to an increase in the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), with CAFs being the main source of VEGF (56). VEGF can be activated by PDGF, also produced by CAFs. PDGF acts by its receptor to induce angiogenesis by indirectly recruiting stromal fibroblasts secreting VEGF (57). PDGF also recruits and induces bone marrow-derived cells (BMCs) to form endothelial or smooth muscle cells, and consequently to promote endothelial and smooth muscle cells proliferation and migration (57). In addition, endothelial cells produce the PDGF B subunit that can induce pericyte recruitment to the vascular wall and maintain endothelial stability, leading to tumor angiogenesis (58). Moreover, in OVAC, VEGF-A, another VEGF family member, stimulates cancer stem cells (CSCs) in OVAC via its activation of the VEGFR2-dependent receptor in order to upregulate the integration site 1 of B-cell-specific Moloney murine leukemia virus integration site 1 (Bmi1) (59). CAFs are also involved in creating and maintaining CSCs through insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-IR) activation. This activation induces Nanog expression, the main transcription factor that confers the pluripotency of autonomous renewal and ground state to the phenotype of embryonic stem cells and reprogramming into cancer cells (60). IGF signaling is associated with OVAC chemoresistance and tumor development (61); IGF-1R-AKT signaling activation through the actions of chemotherapeutics agents increase rise the production of genes involved in self-renewal (Oct4/Sox2/Nanog), promoting heterogeneous functioning in ovarian CSCs during the acquisition of chemoresistance (62). However, metastasis to other organs occurs when cancer cells recruit normal fibroblasts into the tumor mass to be activated by various self-regulated genetic and epigenetic alterations regulated by cancer cells, for which the prolonged activated state may be related to epigenetic reprogramming (6365). Indeed, the global hypomethylation of CAF genomes has been reported (66), as is the case of the promoter of the hypermethylation of the RAS protein activator like-1 (RASAL1), leading to the suppression of its transcription, the augmented activity of Ras-GTP and the perpetuation of fibroblast activation in renal fibrosis (64). This global hypermethylation suggests the possibility of stimulating the upregulation of genes associated with CAF secretome. As discussed in the previous section, fibroblast activation in CAFs is multifactorial (29,4345) and activators include epidermal PDGF, fibroblast growth factor (FGF)2, EGF and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL)12 (43). In addition, communication between cells through adhesion molecules include CAFs, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (67). Subsequently, tumor growth is dependent on the irregular and uncontrollable proliferation of cancer cells and CAFs that are undeniably inducers of tumorigenic activation signals (68), producing autocrine and/or paracrine cytokines promoting the biologically features of the tumors.

However, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), another major component of the stroma are also affected by CAFs (69). TAMs were at first classified through two distinct cell types, including the ‘classically’ activated (M1 or type I) and the ‘alternatively’ activated (M2 or type II) macrophages.

M1 macrophages produce a large part of ROS and can orchestrate an anti-tumor TH1 immune response, while M2 macrophages play an important role in tumor progression, promoting the reparation of tissues, as well as angiogenesis. M2 macrophages also produce immunosuppressive factors, including IL-10, arginase, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and TGF-β (69). The enrolment of monocytes into the TME and their differentiation into M2 macrophages are promoted by CAFs (70). Particularly, CAFs induce the secretion of CXCL12/stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), the macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF or CSF-1), IL-6 and CCL2/MCP-1 dynamically encouraging the enrolment of monocytes to the TME and their differentiation into a M2 immunosuppressive phenotype (7072). Thus, CAFs and OVAC are associated at all levels of cancer development and progression. In addition, CAFs may be a determinant of malignant cancer progression and at the same time are an important target for cancer treatments, since they produce factors that facilitate the angiogenic recruitment of endothelial cells and pericytes, such as growth factors, chemokines and the ECM.

Targeting CAFs for diagnosis and cancer therapy

In preclinical and clinical in vivo studies, CAFs are identified by 4 types of markers, including: i) ECM components, including type I and II collagen, fibronectin, tenascin C (TN-C) and periostin, as well as remodeling enzymes, such as lysyl oxidase (LOX), LOXL1, MMP and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP); ii) cytokines and growth factors, such as TGF-β, VEGF, PDGF, EGF, FGF, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), SDF-1 (CXCL12) and WNT; iii) ligands and receptors, such as PDGFRα/β, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1), discoidin domain-containing receptor 2 (DDR2), TGF-βRI/II, EGFR, FGFR, bone morphogenetic protein receptor (BMPR)I (BMPR1A/B)/BMPRII, podoplanin and fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAP), as well as a decrease in caveolin 1 (CAV1) expression; iv) components of the cytoskeleton and cytoplasmic proteins, including desmin, vimentin, αSMA and FSP1/S100A4 (73).

Therefore, targeting CAF formation refers to defining the controlling pathways that lead to the activation or depletion of CAFs once they are formed. This may correspond to negatively interacting with complex pathways that can alter change the equilibrium of the OVAC microenvironment, and the risk of toxicity may exist. In this respect, currently, clinical treatments target the activation or modulation of CAF functions, but do not completely terminate their formation. This is the case for the gene encoding the serine-threonine protein kinase B-RAF (BRAF) that has been targeted in melanoma to activate CAFs. This remodels the tumor ECM and provides pro-tumorigenic signals supporting residual disease (74,75). In addition, Nagasaki et al (76) also reported that the neutralization of IL-6 receptors with antibody inhibited IL-6 signaling and tumor angiogenesis. This is carried out through the inhibition of interactions between the cancer and stroma, as cancer cells stimulate IL-6 secretion from fibroblasts and subsequently induce tumor angiogenesis, suggesting IL-6 as a novel anti-angiogenesis therapeutic target (77). In the same manner, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors have been approved by the FDA as targeted therapies (14). In addition, inhibitors of angiogenesis FGFRs, PDGFRα/β, multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase (RTKi), cyclooxygenase (Cox)-2 and cytokines and their receptors are involved in clinical trials (78). The cell-surface serine protease, also termed FAP, for specifically targeting CAFs, is another class emerging as promising candidates. It has been shown that the depletion of FAP+ CAFs in mice suffering from melanoma reduces the activity of immunosuppressive cells and improves the antitumoral activity of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating T cells (79,80).

Conclusions and perspectives

Initially, the OVAC therapeutic options are chiefly reduction surgery surveyed by adjuvant chemotherapy or vice versa. With the understanding of the productive nature of the peritoneal cavity for carcinomatosis, of the mechanisms underlying the unmitigated activation of fibroblasts that remain largely unknown, as well as the complexity of receptor/ligand-mediated interactions between stromal cells and tumor cells, CAFs have been found to be a key part of the TME contributing primarily to the maintenance, progression and metastasis of OVAC and therapeutic resistance. Therefore, the development of novel early diagnostic tools and therapies targeting CAFs should be promising. Although several strategies against CAFs have been undertaken and have shown promising results, the effectiveness of most drugs targeting the stroma as single agents seems limited. Much remains to be done to identify, with minimal toxicity, the most effective combinations with anti-CAFs alone or in combination with other treatments.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

WS conceived and designed the study. SF was responsible for the collection and assembly of the articles/published data, inclusion criteria for the studies and interpretation. Both authors were involved in writing the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Goff BA, Mandel LS, Drescher CW, Urban N, Gough S, Schurman KM, Patras J, Mahony BS and Andersen MR: Development of an ovarian cancer symptom index: Possibilities for earlier detection. Cancer. 109:221–227. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Borley J, Wilhelm-Benartzi C, Yazbek J, Williamson R, Bharwani N, Stewart V, Carson I, Hird E, McIndoe A, Farthing A, et al: Radiological predictors of cytoreductive outcomes in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. BJOG. 122:843–849. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Lu KH, Coleman RL, Sood AK, Malpica A, Deavers MT, Silva EG and Bodurka DC: Clinical behavior of stage II–IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol. 108:361–368. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Bankhead CR, Kehoe ST and Austoker J: Symptoms associated with diagnosis of ovarian cancer: A systematic review. BJOG. 112:857–865. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Borley J, Wilhelm-Benartzi C, Brown R and Ghaem-Maghami S: Does tumour biology determine surgical success in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer? A systematic literature review. Br J Cancer. 107:1069–1074. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Ohshio Y, Teramoto K, Hanaoka J, Tezuka N, Itoh Y, Asai T, Daigo Y and Ogasawara K: Cancer-associated fibroblast-targeted strategy enhances antitumor immune responses in dendritic cell-based vaccine. Cancer Sci. 106:134–142. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Ziani L, Chouaib S and Thiery J: Alteration of the Antitumor Immune Response by Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts. Front Immunol. 9:4142018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Willmott LJ and Fruehauf JP: Targeted therapy in ovarian cancer. J Oncol. 2010:7404722010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Sun Y: Translational horizons in the tumor microenvironment: Harnessing breakthroughs and targeting cures. Med Res Rev. 35:408–436. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, . Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 474:609–615. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Ahmed N and Stenvers KL: Getting to know ovarian cancer ascites: Opportunities for targeted therapy-based translational research. Front Oncol. 3:2562013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Balkwill FR, Capasso M and Hagemann T: The tumor microenvironment at a glance. J Cell Sci. 125:5591–5596. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Worzfeld T, Pogge von Strandmann E, Huber M, Adhikary T, Wagner U, Reinartz S and Müller R: The unique molecular and cellular microenvironment of ovarian cancer. Front Oncol. 7:242017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Ghoneum A, Afify H, Salih Z, Kelly M and Said N: Role of tumor microenvironment in ovarian cancer pathobiology. Oncotarget. 9:22832–22849. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Cirri P and Chiarugi P: Cancer-associated-fibroblasts and tumour cells: A diabolic liaison driving cancer progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 31:195–208. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Trivedi N, Marsh P, Goold RG, Wood-Kaczmar A and Gordon-Weeks PR: Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta phosphorylation of MAP1B at Ser1260 and Thr1265 is spatially restricted to growing axons. J Cell Sci. 118:993–1005. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Quail DF and Joyce JA: Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. 19:1423–1437. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Slany A, Bileck A, Muqaku B and Gerner C: Targeting breast cancer-associated fibroblasts to improve anti-cancer therapy. Breast. 24:532–538. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Ghoneum A, Afify H, Salih Z, Kelly M and Said N: Role of tumor microenvironment in the pathobiology of ovarian cancer: Insights and therapeutic opportunities. Cancer Med. 7:5047–5056. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Parsonage G, Filer AD, Haworth O, Nash GB, Rainger GE, Salmon M and Buckley CD: A stromal address code defined by fibroblasts. Trends Immunol. 26:150–156. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Tomasek JJ, McRae J, Owens GK and Haaksma CJ: Regulation of alpha-smooth muscle actin expression in granulation tissue myofibroblasts is dependent on the intronic CArG element and the transforming growth factor-beta1 control element. Am J Pathol. 166:1343–1351. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Rodemann HP and Müller GA: Characterization of human renal fibroblasts in health and disease: II. In vitro growth, differentiation, and collagen synthesis of fibroblasts from kidneys with interstitial fibrosis. Am J Kidney Dis. 17:684–686. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Chang HY, Chi JT, Dudoit S, Bondre C, van de Rijn M, Botstein D and Brown PO: Diversity, topographic differentiation, and positional memory in human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:12877–12882. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Simian M, Hirai Y, Navre M, Werb Z, Lochter A and Bissell MJ: The interplay of matrix metalloproteinases, morphogens and growth factors is necessary for branching of mammary epithelial cells. Development. 128:3117–3131. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Tuxhorn JA, Ayala GE, Smith MJ, Smith VC, Dang TD and Rowley DR: Reactive stroma in human prostate cancer: Induction of myofibroblast phenotype and extracellular matrix remodeling. Clin Cancer Res. 8:2912–2923. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Dotto GP, Weinberg RA and Ariza A: Malignant transformation of mouse primary keratinocytes by Harvey sarcoma virus and its modulation by surrounding normal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 85:6389–6393. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Castor CW, Wilson SM, Heiss PR and Seidman JC: Activation of lung connective tissue cells in vitro. Am Rev Respir Dis. 120:101–106. 1979.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Müller GA and Rodemann HP: Characterization of human renal fibroblasts in health and disease: I. Immunophenotyping of cultured tubular epithelial cells and fibroblasts derived from kidneys with histologically proven interstitial fibrosis. Am J Kidney Dis. 17:680–683. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Calon A, Tauriello DV and Batlle E: TGF-beta in CAF-mediated tumor growth and metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 25:15–22. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Marsh T, Pietras K and McAllister SS: Fibroblasts as architects of cancer pathogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1832:1070–1078. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Kalluri R and Zeisberg M: Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 6:392–401. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Yáñez-Mó M, Lara-Pezzi E, Selgas R, Ramírez-Huesca M, Domínguez-Jiménez C, Jiménez-Heffernan JA, Aguilera A, Sánchez-Tomero JA, Bajo MA, Alvarez V, et al: Peritoneal dialysis and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of mesothelial cells. N Engl J Med. 348:403–413. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Sandoval P, Jiménez-Heffernan JA, Rynne-Vidal Á, Pérez-Lozano ML, Gilsanz Á, Ruiz-Carpio V, Reyes R, García-Bordas J, Stamatakis K, Dotor J, et al: Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts derive from mesothelial cells via mesothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in peritoneal metastasis. J Pathol. 231:517–531. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Ishii G, Ochiai A and Neri S: Phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of cancer-associated fibroblast within the tumor microenvironment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 99:186–196. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Kalluri R: The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 16:582–598. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Marsh EE, Ekpo GE, Cardozo ER, Brocks M, Dune T and Cohen LS: Racial differences in fibroid prevalence and ultrasound findings in asymptomatic young women (18–30 years old): A pilot study. Fertil Steril. 99:1951–1957. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Bainbridge P: Wound healing and the role of fibroblasts. J Wound Care. 22:407–408, 410-412. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Duffield JS, Lupher M, Thannickal VJ and Wynn TA: Host responses in tissue repair and fibrosis. Annu Rev Pathol. 8:241–276. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Kalluri R: EMT: When epithelial cells decide to become mesenchymal-like cells. J Clin Invest. 119:1417–1419. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Klingberg F, Hinz B and White ES: The myofibroblast matrix: Implications for tissue repair and fibrosis. J Pathol. 229:298–309. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Zeisberg M and Kalluri R: Cellular mechanisms of tissue fibrosis. 1. Common and organ-specific mechanisms associated with tissue fibrosis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 304:C216–C225. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Procopio MG, Laszlo C, Al Labban D, Kim DE, Bordignon P, Jo SH, Goruppi S, Menietti E, Ostano P, Ala U, et al: Combined CSL and p53 downregulation promotes cancer-associated fibroblast activation. Nat Cell Biol. 17:1193–1204. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Räsänen K and Vaheri A: Activation of fibroblasts in cancer stroma. Exp Cell Res. 316:2713–2722. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Cai J, Tang H, Xu L, Wang X, Yang C, Ruan S, Guo J, Hu S and Wang Z: Fibroblasts in omentum activated by tumor cells promote ovarian cancer growth, adhesion and invasiveness. Carcinogenesis. 33:20–29. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Alexander J and Cukierman E: Stromal dynamic reciprocity in cancer: Intricacies of fibroblastic-ECM interactions. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 42:80–93. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Lau TS, Chan LK, Wong EC, Hui CW, Sneddon K, Cheung TH, Yim SF, Lee JH, Yeung CS, Chung TK, et al: A loop of cancer-stroma-cancer interaction promotes peritoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer via TNFα-TGFα-EGFR. Oncogene. 36:3576–3587. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Rynne-Vidal A, Au-Yeung CL, Jiménez-Heffernan JA, Pérez-Lozano ML, Cremades-Jimeno L, Bárcena C, Cristóbal-García I, Fernández-Chacón C, Yeung TL, Mok SC, et al: Mesothelial-to-mesenchymal transition as a possible therapeutic target in peritoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer. J Pathol. 242:140–151. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Dirat B, Bochet L, Dabek M, Daviaud D, Dauvillier S, Majed B, Wang YY, Meulle A, Salles B, Le Gonidec S, et al: Cancer-associated adipocytes exhibit an activated phenotype and contribute to breast cancer invasion. Cancer Res. 71:2455–2465. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Bochet L, Lehuédé C, Dauvillier S, Wang YY, Dirat B, Laurent V, Dray C, Guiet R, Maridonneau-Parini I, Le Gonidec S, et al: Adipocyte-derived fibroblasts promote tumor progression and contribute to the desmoplastic reaction in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 73:5657–5668. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Zoico E, Darra E, Rizzatti V, Budui S, Franceschetti G, Mazzali G, Rossi AP, Fantin F, Menegazzi M, Cinti S, et al: Adipocytes WNT5a mediated dedifferentiation: A possible target in pancreatic cancer microenvironment. Oncotarget. 7:20223–20235. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Lawler HM, Underkofler CM, Kern PA, Erickson C, Bredbeck B and Rasouli N: Adipose tissue hypoxia, inflammation, and fibrosis in obese insulin-sensitive and obese insulin-resistant subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 101:1422–1428. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Evrard SM, Lecce L, Michelis KC, Nomura-Kitabayashi A, Pandey G, Purushothaman KR, d'Escamard V, Li JR, Hadri L, Fujitani K, et al: Endothelial to mesenchymal transition is common in atherosclerotic lesions and is associated with plaque instability. Nat Commun. 7:118532016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Madar S, Goldstein I and Rotter V: ‘Cancer associated fibroblasts’--more than meets the eye. Trends Mol Med. 19:447–453. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Yeung TL, Leung CS, Wong KK, Samimi G, Thompson MS, Liu J, Zaid TM, Ghosh S, Birrer MJ and Mok SC: TGF-β modulates ovarian cancer invasion by upregulating CAF-derived versican in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res. 73:5016–5028. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Wang L, Yang D, Tian J, Gao A, Shen Y, Ren X, Li X, Jiang G and Dong T: Tumor necrosis factor receptor 2/AKT and ERK signaling pathways contribute to the switch from fibroblasts to CAFs by progranulin in microenvironment of colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 8:26323–26333. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

56 

Gomes FG, Nedel F, Alves AM, Nör JE and Tarquinio SB: Tumor angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis: Tumor/endothelial crosstalk and cellular/microenvironmental signaling mechanisms. Life Sci. 92:101–107. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Ferrara N: Pathways mediating VEGF-independent tumor angiogenesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 21:21–26. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Zhang J and Liu J: Tumor stroma as targets for cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 137:200–215. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

Zhao Q, Gui T, Qian Q, Li L and Shen K: B-cell-specific Moloney murine leukemia virus integration site 1: Potential stratification factor and therapeutic target for epithelial ovarian cancer. OncoTargets Ther. 9:5203–5208. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

60 

Jeter CR, Yang T, Wang J, Chao HP and Tang DG: Concise Review: NANOG in cancer stem cells and tumor development: An update and outstanding questions. Stem Cells. 33:2381–2390. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Denduluri SK, Idowu O, Wang Z, Liao Z, Yan Z, Mohammed MK, Ye J, Wei Q, Wang J, Zhao L, et al: Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling in tumorigenesis and the development of cancer drug resistance. Genes Dis. 2:13–25. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Singh RK, Dhadve A, Sakpal A, De A and Ray P: An active IGF-1R-AKT signaling imparts functional heterogeneity in ovarian CSC population. Sci Rep. 6:366122016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

63 

Albrengues J, Bertero T, Grasset E, Bonan S, Maiel M, Bourget I, Philippe C, Herraiz Serrano C, Benamar S, Croce O, et al: Epigenetic switch drives the conversion of fibroblasts into proinvasive cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Commun. 6:102042015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Bechtel W, McGoohan S, Zeisberg EM, Müller GA, Kalbacher H, Salant DJ, Müller CA, Kalluri R and Zeisberg M: Methylation determines fibroblast activation and fibrogenesis in the kidney. Nat Med. 16:544–550. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

65 

Zeisberg EM and Zeisberg M: The role of promoter hypermethylation in fibroblast activation and fibrogenesis. J Pathol. 229:264–273. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

66 

Jiang L, Gonda TA, Gamble MV, Salas M, Seshan V, Tu S, Twaddell WS, Hegyi P, Lazar G, Steele I, et al: Global hypomethylation of genomic DNA in cancer-associated myofibroblasts. Cancer Res. 68:9900–9908. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

67 

Clayton A, Evans RA, Pettit E, Hallett M, Williams JD and Steadman R: Cellular activation through the ligation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1. J Cell Sci. 111:443–453. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

68 

Bhowmick NA, Neilson EG and Moses HL: Stromal fibroblasts in cancer initiation and progression. Nature. 432:332–337. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

69 

Mao Y, Keller ET, Garfield DH, Shen K and Wang J: Stromal cells in tumor microenvironment and breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 32:303–315. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

70 

Zheng X, Turkowski K, Mora J, Brüne B, Seeger W, Weigert A and Savai R: Redirecting tumor-associated macrophages to become tumoricidal effectors as a novel strategy for cancer therapy. Oncotarget. 8:48436–48452. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

71 

De Veirman K, Rao L, De Bruyne E, Menu E, Van Valckenborgh E, Van Riet I, Frassanito MA, Di Marzo L, Vacca A and Vanderkerken K: Cancer associated fibroblasts and tumor growth: Focus on multiple myeloma. Cancers (Basel). 6:1363–1381. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

72 

Cho H, Seo Y, Loke KM, Kim SW, Oh SM, Kim JH, Soh J, Kim HS, Lee H, Kim J, et al: Cancer-stimulated CAFs enhance monocyte differentiation and protumoral TAM activation via IL6 and GM-CSF secretion. Clin Cancer Res. 24:5407–5421. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

73 

LeBleu VS and Kalluri R: A peek into cancer-associated fibroblasts: origins, functions and translational impact. Dis Model Mech. 11:dmm0294472018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

74 

Hu-Lieskovan S, Mok S, Homet Moreno B, Tsoi J, Robert L, Goedert L, Pinheiro EM, Koya RC, Graeber TG, Comin-Anduix B, et al: Improved antitumor activity of immunotherapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF(V600E) melanoma. Sci Transl Med. 7:279ra412015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

75 

Hirata E, Girotti MR, Viros A, Hooper S, Spencer-Dene B, Matsuda M, Larkin J, Marais R and Sahai E: Intravital imaging reveals how BRAF inhibition generates drug-tolerant microenvironments with high integrin β1/FAK signaling. Cancer Cell. 27:574–588. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

76 

Nagasaki T, Hara M, Nakanishi H, Takahashi H, Sato M and Takeyama H: Interleukin-6 released by colon cancer-associated fibroblasts is critical for tumour angiogenesis: Anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody suppressed angiogenesis and inhibited tumour-stroma interaction. Br J Cancer. 110:469–478. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

77 

Kato T, Noma K, Ohara T, Kashima H, Katsura Y, Sato H, Komoto S, Katsube R, Ninomiya T, Tazawa H, et al: Cancer-associated fibroblasts affect intratumoral CD8+ and FoxP3+ T cells via IL6 in the tumor microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res. 24:4820–4833. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

78 

Hofmeister V, Schrama D and Becker JC: Anti-cancer therapies targeting the tumor stroma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 57:1–17. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

79 

Valero T, Steele S, Neumüller K, Bracher A, Niederleithner H, Pehamberger H, Petzelbauer P and Loewe R: Combination of dacarbazine and dimethylfumarate efficiently reduces melanoma lymph node metastasis. J Invest Dermatol. 130:1087–1094. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

80 

Umansky V and Sevko A: Overcoming immunosuppression in the melanoma microenvironment induced by chronic inflammation. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 61:275–282. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September 2019
Volume 18 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
APA
Sun, W., & Sun, W. (2019). Role of cancer-associated fibroblasts in tumor structure, composition and the microenvironment in ovarian cancer (Review). Oncology Letters, 18, 2173-2178. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10587
MLA
Sun, W., Fu, S."Role of cancer-associated fibroblasts in tumor structure, composition and the microenvironment in ovarian cancer (Review)". Oncology Letters 18.3 (2019): 2173-2178.
Chicago
Sun, W., Fu, S."Role of cancer-associated fibroblasts in tumor structure, composition and the microenvironment in ovarian cancer (Review)". Oncology Letters 18, no. 3 (2019): 2173-2178. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10587