Open Access

Identification of novel cadherin 23 variants in a Chinese family with hearing loss

  • Authors:
    • Tianni Xu
    • Wei Zhu
    • Ping Wang
    • Haonan Li
    • Shuyuan Yu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 15, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.10503
  • Pages: 2609-2616
  • Copyright: © Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to elucidate the role of the non‑syndromic autosomal recessive deafness 12 allelic variant of cadherin 23 (CDH23) in Chinese patients with non‑syndromic hearing loss. The present study focused on a Chinese family with hearing loss in which there were two siblings with autosomal, recessive deafness, ranging from severe to profound hearing loss over all frequencies. DNA sequencing was used to assess the genetic factors in the disease etiology. The data revealed a compound heterozygous mutation of CDH23 in both patients. Genetic CDH23 variants are known to be responsible for non‑syndromic hearing loss, and CDH23 variants frequently occur in various populations, including Japanese and Republic of Korean. Results from the present study, indicated a significant contribution of CDH23 variants to the non‑syndromic hearing loss in Chinese patients.

Introduction

Hearing loss or hearing impairment refers to a partial inability to hear sounds in one or both ears, while deafness is defined by full inability to hear (1). The Global Burden of Disease Study has demonstrated that hearing loss is the fourth leading cause of global disability (2). In the United States, the prevalence of hearing loss doubles every 10 years with an increasingly aging population (3). Risk factors for hearing loss include genetic factors, aging, a noisy environment, ear trauma or infection, birth complications, certain medications and toxins (1). Genetic factors may be responsible for ~40% of childhood hearing loss, especially in children born of consanguineous marriages (46). Hundreds of gene mutations have been identified that lead to hearing loss either as an exclusive clinical feature or in combination with extra-auditory symptoms as part of a syndrome (7). Non-syndromic forms of deafness account for 70% of cases, of which~85% are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner (8,9). Owing to recent improvements in research of genetic factors, such as the identification of gene mutations involved in congenital hearing loss, genetic counseling has emerged and increased in availability (1). High-throughput DNA sequencing technologies, known as next-generation DNA sequencing or massively parallel sequencing, are used to detect multiple gene mutations, which results in improved detection and early treatment of childhood hearing loss (10).

Recessive genetic mutations of cadherin 23 (CDH23) have been associated with the allelic variants Usher syndrome type 1D (USH1D) and non-syndromic autosomal recessive deafness 12 (DFNB12) (11,12). CDH23 is on chromosome 10q21-q22 and contains 69 exons that encode the CDH23 protein. CDH23 comprises 3,354 amino acids with 27 cadherin extracellular (EC) repeats, a single transmembrane domain and a short unique cytoplasmic domain (12). Each EC domain of the CDH23 protein contains several cadherin-specific amino acid motifs, such as LDRE, DXD and DXNDN, and is highly conserved in sequence and spacing, which is required for cadherin dimerization and calcium-binding (13). CDH23 mutations induce disorganization of the stereocilia in the hair cells of the inner ear in the ‘waltzer’ mouse model of the USH1D (14). Thus, the extracellular domains of CAD23 are crucial for the correct morphogenesis of hair bundles in the inner ear neurosensory cells, whereas the cytoplasmic domain of the CDH23 interacts with other hair bundle proteins, including myosin VIIA and harmonin (15,16). However, an increasing number of genetic variants of different genes have been reported, such as USH1D and DFNB12 (1720). Certain gene variants occur with a distinct frequency in different populations. For example, two variants were screened in patients with a Swedish background (17), whereas others were present in Japanese or Korean subjects (1820). The aim of the present study was to elucidate the role of the DFNB12 CDH23 mutation in Chinese patients with non-syndromic hearing loss. The nature of diverse CDH23 mutations and their resulting phenotypes in hearing loss were studied using a comprehensive strategy that included DNA sequencing and bioinformatics, which provided information regarding hearing loss in Asian populations.

Materials and methods

Study subjects

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University (Changchun, China) and all participants provided written informed consent prior to being enrolled in the study. The study enrolled two patients (II:1 and II:2) with severe sensorineural hearing loss and their parents (I:1 and I:2). Clinical information and peripheral blood samples were acquired for DNA extraction and DNA sequencing. The patients were diagnosed using audiologic tests according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines (21). Linkage analysis was not carried out owing to the small number of participants.

DNA extraction and DNA sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from the blood samples using a TIANamp Blood DNA Kit (TianGen Biotech Co., Ltd.) and quantified using a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Subsequently, the genomic DNA samples were subjected to DNA sequencing focusing on nine gene loci: GJB2:35delG, 176del16, 235delC, 299delAT, GJB3:538C>T, SLC26A4:2168A>G, IVS7-2A>G, mitochondrial 12SrRNA:1494C>T and 1555A>G, using the LuxScan 10K Microarray Scanner (CapitalBio Corporation). A customized exome enrichment kit (MyGenostics, Inc.) was designed to identify genes that induce hearing loss. The prepared samples were sequenced using Illumina NextSeq 500 (Illumina, Inc.).

DNA libraries were constructed using the genomic DNA samples with a Library Preparation kit (MyGenostics, Inc.), according to the Illumina platform requirements. The enzymatic fragmentation of genomic DNA samples was end-repaired, and adapters were added. The length of the prepared libraries was ~350–400 bp, and they were amplified by PCR and analyzed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent technologies Inc.) by MyGenostics, Inc. The aligned short reads were compared with the human reference genome (hg19) (http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu) using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (version 0.7.15; http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net/). The quality control assessment and variant calling were processed using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK; version 3.6; http://www.broadinstitute.org/gatk/) following GATK best practices (22) and annotated using ANNOVAR (version 2016-02-01), similarly to a previous study (23). Potential damaging gene variants were screened for quality against the 1000 Genomes public variant databases (ftp://ftp.1000genomes.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/ftp), the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP), Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant (SIFT; http://sift.bii.a-star.edu.sg) and Polyphen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2). Considering the deduction of an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance, only the variants that were homozygous or compound heterozygous were selected as candidates.

The variants that met the search criteria were validated by PCR-based Sanger sequencing using the following primers: CDH23 exon 9, forward 5′-TACAACGTGCCCCATTCTGC-3′, reverse 5′-GTCTAGGTTCAGCTATGCCGTT-3′; CDH23 exon 43, forward 5′-TCTTCCGTGGTGGTCCATTT-3′, reverse 5′-AGATGCCTACTGGCTCTCCTT-3′. The TransStart Taq DNA Polymerase kit (Beijing TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd.) was used according to the manufacturers protocol and the thermocycling conditions were as follows: 94°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 15 sec, 55°C for 30 sec, 68°C for 2 min. The amplification product was between 200 and 400 bp. The data were analyzed using Lasergene-SeqMan software (Lasergene 9; DNAStar, Inc.) and the DNA sequences were compared with the sequence of CDH23 (NM_022124.5) and corresponding CDH23 protein sequences (NP_071407.4). In total, three sequences were compared to establish a consensus.

In silico analysis

Pathogenicity of the missense variants of CDH23 was predicted by using SIFT and Polyphen-2. The pathogenicity was determined using the following criteria: i) The variants were considered as ‘likely damaging or damaging’ by either SIFT or Polyphen-2; ii) the variants occurred at the residues that were highly conserved among various species; iii) the variants occurred in affected subjects in homozygous or compound heterozygous phenotypes.

A 3D molecular structure model of the extracellular domain was generated using I-TASSER (http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER) and compared with the confidence score and TM-score using the predicted models. The confidence score is used to estimate the quality of the predicted models using I-TASSER (https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/) It is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. TM-scores are a recently proposed scale for measuring the structural similarity between two structures (24). The DeepView/Swiss-PdbViewer (http://spdbv.vital-it.ch) was used for structural analysis and visualization.

Results

Patient clinicopathological features

The proband was a 24-year-old female (II:1) that had bilateral hearing loss, and the sibling of the proband was a 17-year-old male (II:2) with severe deafness. Pure tone audiometry revealed profound sensorineural hearing loss at all frequencies. The patients' parents (I:1 and I:2) had normal hearing, and all other family members exhibited no impairment in movement, vestibular or visual functions.

Genetic analysis

Nine gene loci (GJB2:35delG, 176del16, 235delC, 299delAT, GJB3:538C>T, SLC26A4:2168A>G, IVS7-2A>G, mitochondrial 12SrRNA:1494C>T and 1555A>G) were analyzed and none was detected in either of the siblings or in the mother. However, mitochondrial 12SrRNA 1555A>G was detected in the father. Following exclusion of variants of these four genes by Sanger sequencing, the target region capture sequence was used to resolve the genetic causes. Compound heterozygous variants in CDH23 from the proband were identified following DNA sequencing as one of the two shifts caused by a transition CDH23:c.791A>T in exon 9 (Fig. 1). This transition resulted in the substitution of a valine with an aspartic acid at position 264 (p.D264V). The other variant identified was CDH23:c.5853T>A in exon 43. This resulted in the substitution of an aspartic acid for a glutamic acid residue at position 1951 (p.D1951E; Fig. 1).

The associated regions of CDH23 were subsequently sequenced in other family members (Fig. 2) and it was revealed that p.D264V also occurred in the patients' mother. p.D1951E was considered to be a paternal gene, and multiple sequence alignment of the two affected EC domains revealed that the amino acids residues were well-conserved among various species, including Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus and Danio rerio (Fig. 2C).

In silico analysis

Two novel mutations of CDH23 (c.791A>T and c.5853T>A) were identified in the coding region, both of which were missense variants. The data were subsequently scored on the compatibility with the 1000 Genome sequence database, the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database, SIFT and PolyPhen2 score (Table I) and according to the scores, the two gene variants were damaged, which was indicated by the comparison with SIFT and Polyphen-2.

Table I.

Pathogenicity prediction of cadherin 23 variants associated with hearing loss using in silico analysis.

Table I.

Pathogenicity prediction of cadherin 23 variants associated with hearing loss using in silico analysis.

Nucleotide changeAmino acid changeExonDomaindbSNP1000 GenomesPolyphen-2 scoreaSIFT scoreb
c.791A>Tp.D264V  9  3N/A0.9980.00
c.5853T>A p.D1951E4318N/A0.9970.00

a Prediction of a change being damaging (>0.85), possibly damaging (0.15–0.85) or benign (<0.15).

b Prediction of a change being damaging (<0.05) or tolerated. RefSeq NM_022124.5, CDH23 transcript variant 1; NP_071407.4, CDH23 isoform 1 precursor. -, not found; N/A, not applicable; CDH23, cadherin 23.

3D models of these variants were created and revealed that affected EC domains (containing aspartic acid residues) contained the highly conserved calcium-binding motifs, EC3 and EC18, in the location of the linking cadherin repeats (Fig. 3). The substitution at residue 264 was the second aspartic acid residue of the DXD calcium-binding motif in EC3. The substitution at residue 1,951 was the first aspartic acid residue of DXNDN calcium-binding motif in EC18. Modeling analysis of the mutated CDH23 used in the present study revealed that these CDH23 variants were related to DXD and DXNDN motifs. Consistently, DNFB12 mutations were more likely to be involved in the highly conserved regions, such as LDRE, DXNDN and DXD, compared with USH1D (Fig. 4).

Discussion

Previous studies have indicated that CDH23 expression is vital for the bundle of hair cells in the cochlea and serves an important role in the establishment and maintenance of the proper organization of the stereocilia (25,26). CDH23 forms a functional network with USH1C, USH1G, CDH23 and myosin VIIA, and participates in mechanotransduction in auditory processing; therefore, CDH23 variants may contribute to hearing loss. The present study identified two novel missense mutations of CDH23, c.791A>T and c.5853T>A, in the coding region.

The gene mutation spectrum can be distinguished across different ethnic origins. For example, GJB2:c.35delG occurs more frequently in people of Caucasian origin, whereas GJB2:c.167delT is prevalent in Ashkenazi Jews; GJB2:p.R143W was found in an African farmer, and GJB2:c.235delC is commonly reported in East Asian countries (27,28). The frequency of the gene mutations involved in hearing loss is due to the founder effect (1). In the present study, nine gene loci (GJB2:35delG, 176del16, 235delC, 299delAT, GJB3:538C>T, SLC26A4:2168A>G, IVS7-2A>G, mitochondrial 12SrRNA:1494C>T and 1555A>G) were assessed, but none of these mutations was identified in either affected sibling. However, using the target region captured DNA sequencing technology, two novel pathological CDH23 variants were identified, which may be possible pathological variants and missense CDH23 mutations; this was in agreement with previous studies (11,17,18). A previous study demonstrated nonsense, frame shift or splice mutations of CDH23 in patients with USH1D (17). Aspartic acid is a medium-sized acidic residue, whereas, valine is hydrophobic. Substitution of the aspartic acid residues with valine strongly reduced the number of oxygen atoms binding to calcium, indicating that these variants may have an effect on CDH23 structure. Thus, this valine substitution may be pathological in hearing loss. These motifs have been suggested to be essential for a calcium-binding ability, which may influence linearization, rigidification and dimerization of cadherin (29,30).

Calcium ions are usually enclosed by several oxygen atoms (31), and the absence of these atoms normally weakens calcium-binding capacity (32). Substitution of the aspartic acid residues with a valine impaired the interaction of the CDH23 protein either with itself or with other protein, owing to the loss of oxygen atoms present in aspartic acid. The c.791A>T mutation involved an amino acid change from an aspartic acid to a hydrophobic valine (p.D264V), which altered the function of the CDH23 protein. In addition, the results of Polyphen-2 and SIFT predicted the impact of these changes and indicated that they may pathogenically affect protein structure or function. Calcium ions serve a crucial role in the process of adaptation of mechanical transduction, frequency tuning, neurotransmitter release and efferent synaptic signaling in the auditory and vestibular systems (33). A previous study has also demonstrated that the CDH23 protein associates with myosin-1c to form a protein complex that is a component of the mechanotransduction apparatus (34). This suggested that CDH23 may participate in the activity of mechanically gated ion channels in hair cells. Missense variants of genes, including CDH23, may be a common cause of disease, depending on the mutation site within the protein. In the present study, two novel CDH23 missense mutations were identified, and the results revealed that there may be an association between gene mutation and disease pathogenicity. In addition, in silico analysis predicted pathogenic variants of a given gene (35), which was used to demonstrate that the two CDH23 variants may contribute to the hearing impairment of the two patients. Previous studies have revealed that CDH23 variants are associated with hearing loss in Chinese patients. For example, a homozygous c.5985C>A (p.Y1995X) variant has been linked to USH1D (36). Patients from the Chinese Jiangxi province were heterozygous with p.E1006K and p.D1663V in CDH23 (37). Regarding the CDH23 spectrum in the Japanese, the frequency was 3.7% (including the heterozygous phenotype) in the hearing loss population and 5.7% (including the heterozygous phenotype) among the recessive inherited cases (19). Two out of 13 (15%) Korean families with non-syndromic hearing loss were affected by CDH23 mutations in an autosomal recessive pattern and three of 93 patients exhibited a heterozygous phenotype (20). Consequently, some CDH23 variants frequently occurred in certain ethnic origins (19,20) and, based on these data, it was speculated that CDH23 variants may be an important cause of hearing loss in Asian populations (Table II). Although the precise pathogenesis and molecular mechanism of hearing have not been defined, the data from the present study and the literature indicate that DFNB12 CDH23 variants may impact the Chinese population with non-syndromic hearing loss.

Table II.

Frequency of cadherin 23 variants in hearing loss.

Table II.

Frequency of cadherin 23 variants in hearing loss.

Number of patients

Author, yearCountryNucleotide changeAmino acid change-/-Compound +/-+/-No. patients(Refs.)
Chai et al, 2015China c.5985C>A p.Y1995X1N/AN/A945(36)
Lu et al, 2014China c.3016G>A p.E1006KN/A2N/A9(37)
c.4988A>T p.D1663V
Miyagawa et al, 2012Japan c.719C>Tp.P240LN/A211,396(19)
c.902G>Ap.R301QN/A3N/A
c.2866G>Ap.E956KN/A12
c.4103C>T p.T1368MN/A1N/A
c.4249C>T p.R1417W1N/A2
c.4877A>C p.D1626AN/A1N/A
c.5147A>C p.Q1716PN/A3N/A
c.6085C>T p.R2029W226
c.6861T>G p.N2287KN/A2N/A
c.7312G>A p.E2438KN/A1N/A
Woo et al, 2014Korea c.719C>Tp.P240LN/A3N/A16(20)
c.1025A>Gp.N342SN/A2N/A
c.4783G>Ap.1595KN/A1N/A
Present studyChina c.791A>Tp.D264VN/A2N/A2
c.5853T>A p.D1951EN/A2N/A

[i] N/A, not applicable.

In conclusion, the present study identified two novel CDH23 mutations in one Chinese family with autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss using the target region captured DNA sequencing. However, the exact frequency requires further investigation as only data from two generations of this family were obtained. Future studies with a larger cohort of patient samples are needed to confirm the present results, which may be used for early detection of hearing loss. In addition, target region captured DNA sequencing technology may be effective for detecting causative gene variants in patients with no mutations in GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4 and mitochondrial 12SrRNA.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. TX, HL and SY performed the experiments. TX drafted the article. PW and WZ critically revised the article. ZW reviewed the submitted version of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University (Changchun, China) and all participants provided written informed consent prior to being enrolled in the study.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the parent of the patient for the publication of this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Shearer AE, Hildebrand MS and Smith RJH: Hereditary hearing loss and deafness overview. Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K and Amemiya A: GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA). University of Washington; Seattle: 1993-2019

2 

GB D, 2015 Disease, Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators: Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 388:1545–1602. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Cunningham LL and Tucci DL: Hearing loss in adults. N Engl J Med. 377:2465–2473. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Olusanya BO, Neumann KJ and Saunders JE: The global burden of disabling hearing impairment: A call to action. Bull World Health Organ. 92:367–373. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Smith RJH, Bale JF Jr and White KR: Sensorineural hearing loss in children. Lancet. 365:879–890. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Paludetti G, Conti G, Di Nardo W, De Corso E, Rolesi R, Picciotti PM and Fetoni AR: Infant hearing loss: From diagnosis to therapy official report of XXI conference of italian society of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 32:347–370. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

7 

Friedman TB and Griffith AJ: Human nonsyndromic sensorineural deafness. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 4:341–402. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Hilgert N, Smith RJ and Van Camp G: Function and expression pattern of nonsyndromic deafness genes. Curr Mol Med. 9:546–564. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Morton NE: Genetic epidemiology of hearing impairment. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 630:16–31. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Funamura JL: Evaluation and management of nonsyndromic congenital hearing loss. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 25:385–389. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Bork JM, Peters LM, Riazuddin S, Bernstein SL, Ahmed ZM, Ness SL, Polomeno R, Ramesh A, Schloss M, Srisailpathy CR, et al: Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of the novel cadherin-like gene CDH23. Am J Hum Genet. 68:26–37. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Bolz H, von Brederlow B, Ramirez A, Bryda EC, Kutsche K, Nothwang HG, Seeliger M, del C-Salcedó Cabrera M, Vila MC, Molina OP, et al: Mutation of CDH23, encoding a new member of the cadherin gene family, causes Usher syndrome type 1D. Nat Genet. 27:108–112. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Rowlands TM, Symonds JM, Farookhi R and Blaschuk OW: Cadherins: Crucial regulators of structure and function in reproductive tissues. Rev Reprod. 5:53–61. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Di Palma F, Holme RH, Bryda EC, Belyantseva IA, Pellegrino R, Kachar B, Steel KP and Noben-Trauth K: Mutations in Cdh23, encoding a new type of cadherin, cause stereocilia disorganization in waltzer, the mouse model for Usher syndrome type 1D. Nat Genet. 27:103–107. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Boëda B, El Amraoui A, Bahloul A, Goodyear R, Daviet L, Blanchard S, Perfettini I, Fath KR, Shorte S, Reiners J, et al: Myosin VIIa, harmonin and cadherin 23, three usher I gene products that cooperate to shape the sensory hair cell bundle. EMBO J. 21:6689–6699. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Siemens J, Kazmierczak P, Reynolds A, Sticker M, Littlewood-Evans A and Müller U: The usher syndrome proteins cadherin 23 and harmonin form a complex by means of PDZ-domain interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:14946–14951. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Astuto LM, Bork JM, Weston MD, Askew JW, Fields RR, Orten DJ, Ohliger SJ, Riazuddin S, Morell RJ, Khan S, et al: CDH23 mutation and phenotype heterogeneity: A profile of 107 diverse families with usher syndrome and nonsyndromic deafness. Am J Hum Genet. 71:262–275. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Wagatsuma M, Kitoh R, Suzuki H, Fukuoka H, Takumi Y and Usami S: Distribution and frequencies of CDH23 mutations in Japanese patients with non-syndromic hearing loss. Clin Genet. 72:339–344. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Miyagawa M, Nishio SY and Usami S: Prevalence and clinical features of hearing loss patients with CDH23 mutations: A large cohort study. PLoS One. 7:e403662012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Woo HM, Park HJ, Park MH, Kim BY, Shin JW, Yoo WG and Koo SK: Identification of CDH23 mutations in Korean families with hearing loss by whole-exome sequencing. BMC Med Genet. 15:462014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Alford RL, Arnos KS, Fox M, Lin JW, Palmer CG, Pandya A, Rehm HL, Robin NH, Scott DA, Yoshinaga-Itano C, et al: American college of medical genetics and genomics guideline for the clinical evaluation and etiologic diagnosis of hearing loss. Genet Med. 16:347–355. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, et al: The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome research. 20:1297–1303. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Huang XF, Xiang P, Chen J, Xing DJ, Huang N, Min Q, Gu F, Tong Y, Pang CP, Qu J and Jin ZB: Targeted exome sequencing identified novel USH2A mutations in Usher syndrome families. PloS One. 8:e638322013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Zhang Y and Skolnick J: Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins. 57:702–710. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Siemens J, Lillo C, Dumont RA, Reynolds A, Williams DS, Gillespie PG and Müller U: Cadherin 23 is a component of the tip link in hair-cell stereocilia. Nature. 428:950–955. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Müller U: Cadherins and mechanotransduction by hair cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 20:557–566. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Tsukada K, Nishio S and Usami S: Deafness Gene Study Consortium. A large cohort study of GJB2 mutations in Japanese hearing loss patients. Clin Genet. 78:464–470. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Van Laer L, Coucke P, Mueller RF, Caethoven G, Flothmann K, Prasad SD, Chamberlin GP, Houseman M, Taylor GR, Van de Heyning CM, et al: A common founder for the 35delG GJB2 gene mutation in connexin 26 hearing impairment. J Med Genet. 38:515–518. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Nagar B, Overduin M, Ikura M and Rini JM: Structural basis of calcium-induced E-cadherin rigidification and dimerization. Nature. 380:360–364. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Angst BD, Marcozzi C and Magee AI: The cadherin superfamily: Diversity in form and function. J Cell Sci. 114:629–641. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Strynadka NC and James MN: Crystal structures of the helix-loop-helix calcium-binding proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 58:951–998. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Chakrabarti P: Systematics in the interaction of metal ions with the main-chain carbonyl group in protein structures. Biochemistry. 29:651–658. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Yamoah EN, Lumpkin EA, Dumont RA, Smith PJ, Hudspeth AJ and Gillespie PG: Plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase extrudes Ca2+ from hair cell stereocilia. J Neurosci. 18:610–624. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Holt JR, Gillespie SK, Provance DW, Shah K, Shokat KM, Corey DP, Mercer JA and Gillespie PG: A chemical-genetic strategy implicates myosin-1c in adaptation by hair cells. Cell. 108:371–381. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, et al: Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the american college of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology. Genet Med. 17:405–424. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Chai Y, Chen D, Sun L, Li L, Chen Y, Pang X, Zhang L, Wu H and Yang T: The homozygous p.V37I variant of GJB2 is associated with diverse hearing phenotypes. Clin Genet. 87:350–355. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Lu Y, Zhou X, Jin Z, Cheng J, Shen W, Ji F, Liu L, Zhang X, Zhang M, Cao Y, et al: Resolving the genetic heterogeneity of prelingual hearing loss within one family: Performance comparison and application of two targeted next generation sequencing approaches. J Hum Genet. 59:599–607. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September 2019
Volume 20 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
APA
Xu, T., Zhu, W., Wang, P., Li, H., & Yu, S. (2019). Identification of novel cadherin 23 variants in a Chinese family with hearing loss. Molecular Medicine Reports, 20, 2609-2616. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.10503
MLA
Xu, T., Zhu, W., Wang, P., Li, H., Yu, S."Identification of novel cadherin 23 variants in a Chinese family with hearing loss". Molecular Medicine Reports 20.3 (2019): 2609-2616.
Chicago
Xu, T., Zhu, W., Wang, P., Li, H., Yu, S."Identification of novel cadherin 23 variants in a Chinese family with hearing loss". Molecular Medicine Reports 20, no. 3 (2019): 2609-2616. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.10503